THE COURT.
This case presents the same questions as those considered in Dillingham v. Welch, ante, p. 656, [178 Pac. 512], An opinion has been filed this day in that case, and upon the authority thereof the judgment herein is reversed.
[L. A. No. 5286.
In Bank.
January 31, 1919.]
Street Law—Special Assessment Under Boad District Improvement Act—Validity op Proceedings.—Judgment reversed on the authority of Dillingham et al. v. Welch, ante, p. 656.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. Reversed.
The facts are similar to those stated in the ease of Dillingham et al v. Welch, ante, p. 656, [178 Pac. 512].
W. S. Knott and John L. Fleming, for Respondents.
A. J. Hill, County Counsel, and Edward T. Bishop, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellant.
THE COURT.
This case presents the same questions as those considered in Dillingham v. Welch, ante, p. 656, [178 Pac. 512], An opinion has been filed this day in that case, and upon the authority thereof the judgment herein is reversed.
179 Cal. 816
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!