90 Ohio St. 3d 316

Malcolm-Smith et al., Appellees, v. Goff, Supt., et al., Appellants.

[Cite as Malcolm—Smith v. Goff (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 316.]

(No. 99-2287

Submitted October 10, 2000

Decided December 13, 2000.)

*317Uche Mgbaraho, Sara J. Harper, Roy Kaufman and Stanley Tolliver, for appellees.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Roger F. Carroll and James G. Tassie, Assistant Attorneys General, and Stephen P. Carney, Associate Solicitor, for appellants John M. Goff and state of Ohio.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Frederick R. Nance and Steven A. Friedman; and Cornell P. Carter, Director of Law, for appellant Michael R. White.

Lisa Marie Ruda, Chief Legal Counsel, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Cleveland Municipal School District.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed by reason of res judicata. Stromberg v. Bratenahl Bd. of Edn. (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 98, 18 O.O.3d 343, 413 N.E.2d 1184. See, also, Richards v. Jefferson Cty., Alabama (1996), 517 U.S. 793, 803, 116 S.Ct. 1761, 1768, 135 L.Ed.2d 76, 87.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Malcolm-Smith v. Goff
90 Ohio St. 3d 316

Case Details

Name
Malcolm-Smith v. Goff
Decision Date
Dec 13, 2000
Citations

90 Ohio St. 3d 316

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!