Project Holding, Inc. v. Smyth 166 N.J. Super. 354

166 N.J. Super. 354

PROJECT HOLDING, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND ACTION COMMITTEE OF FLORAL PARK, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS, v. FRANK SMYTH ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued February 27, 1979

Decided March 15, 1979.

*355Before Judges Matthews, Kole and Milmed.

Mr. William Goldberg argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Laurence B. Orlojf argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Orlojf, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Messrs. Laurence B. Orlojf, Jejfrey M. Garrod and Raymond A. Brown on the brief).

Per Curiam.

We agree with Judge Kentz that the Anti-Eviction Act, N. J. S. A. 2A:18 — 61.1 et seq. is inapplicable to the factual circumstances presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in *356his opinion reported at 152 N. J. Super. 582, insofar as they reach that conclusion.

Since we find N. J. S. A. 2A:18-61.1 et seq. inapplicable, it is unnecessary for us to decide whether its literal application would violate the Supremacy Clause of the 'Constitution of the United States. See 152 N. J. Super. at 598 to 600.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons herein stated.

Project Holding, Inc. v. Smyth

166 N.J. Super. 354

Case Details

Name

Project Holding, Inc. v. Smyth

Decision Date

Mar 15, 1979

Citations

166 N.J. Super. 354

Jurisdiction

New Jersey

Court

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!