49 A.D.3d 511 851 N.Y.S.2d 892

John W. Moncrief, Appellant, v Maureen Rosenthal et al., Respondents.

[851 NYS2d 892]

The defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Appell v Mandel, 296 AD2d 514 [2002]; Singh v Persaud, 269 AD2d 381, 382 [2000]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.

Moncrief v. Rosenthal
49 A.D.3d 511 851 N.Y.S.2d 892

Case Details

Name
Moncrief v. Rosenthal
Decision Date
Mar 4, 2008
Citations

49 A.D.3d 511

851 N.Y.S.2d 892

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!