Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Julio Hernandez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is *405GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
198 F. App'x 404
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Alberto Hernandez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-51292
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez
198 F. App'x 404
Case Details
198 F. App'x 404
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!