574 F. App'x 242

In re: Thomas Donnell SIFFORD, Petitioner.

No. 14-1304.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 29, 2014.

Decided: June 2, 2014.

Thomas Donnell Sifford, Petitioner Pro Se.

*243Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Donnell Sifford petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court has dismissed as successive and unauthorized Sifford’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Sifford’s ease, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Sifford
574 F. App'x 242

Case Details

Name
In re Sifford
Decision Date
Jun 2, 2014
Citations

574 F. App'x 242

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!