Nammack v. Creelman 206 N.Y. 630

In the Matter of the Application of William H. Nammack, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against James C. Creelman et al., Composing the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

(Argued June 3, 1912;

decided June 18, 1912.)

Matter of Nammack v. Creelman, 145 App. Div. 289, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of - the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, *631entered June 16, 1911, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to recognize the petitioner as a coroner’s physician and to certify to his name as such upon the payrolls.

John J. Curtin for appellant.

Archibald B. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley and Elliot 8. Benedict of counsel), for respondents.