90 A.D.3d 755 936 N.Y.S.2d 550

In the Matter of Rachel Fulmer, Appellant, v Michael Buxenbaum, Jr., Respondent.

[936 NYS2d 550]

An order of filiation may be vacated on the grounds of “fraud, *756misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party” (CPLR 5015 [a] [3]; see Matter of Jose F.R. v Reina C.A., 46 AD3d 564 [2007]). The Family Court properly denied the mother’s application to vacate the order of filiation entered in the instant proceeding because she failed to make a prima facie showing of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015 [a] [3]; Matter of Vernon J. v Sandra M., 36 AD3d 912 [2007]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Fulmer v. Buxenbaum
90 A.D.3d 755 936 N.Y.S.2d 550

Case Details

Name
Fulmer v. Buxenbaum
Decision Date
Dec 13, 2011
Citations

90 A.D.3d 755

936 N.Y.S.2d 550

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!