Commonwealth v. Ruffin 524 Pa. 33, 568 A.2d 947

524 Pa. 33 • 568 A.2d 947

568 A.2d 947

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Allen RUFFIN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Dec. 11, 1989.

Decided Jan. 24, 1990.

Carole F. Kafrissen, Philadelphia, and Catherine S. Wilson, Lincoln University, for appellant.

Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Div., Philadelphia, and Maxine Stotland, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The above-captioned case is hereby remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for the filing of motions on the issue of after-discovered evidence and/or motions alleging the ineffective assistance of trial counsel as it would relate to the issue of the property receipt.

The motions must be alleged with specificity, and the trial court, after a hearing, if necessary, must file an opinion *34which includes findings of fact and conclusions of law on this issue. Jurisdiction is relinquished.1

PAPADAKOS, J., dissents.

Commonwealth v. Ruffin
524 Pa. 33 • 568 A.2d 947

Case Details

Name
Commonwealth v. Ruffin
Decision Date
Jan 24, 1990
Citations

524 Pa. 33

568 A.2d 947

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!