123 N.J. Eq. 233

Wilson W. Morrow, petitioner-appellant, v. Marguerite H. Morrow, defendant-respondent.

[Argued October term, 1937.

Decided January 26th, 1938.]

Mr. Sigmund O. Bernstein and Mr. David E. Bernstein, for the petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Ronald A. Guliclc and Mr. Israel B. Greene, for the defendant-respondent.

Per Curiam.

The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned advisory master from whose decree dismissing the appellant’s petition for divorce and granting the prayer of the defendant’s counter-claim the present appeal is taken.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, EEeteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Morrow v. Morrow
123 N.J. Eq. 233

Case Details

Name
Morrow v. Morrow
Decision Date
Jan 26, 1938
Citations

123 N.J. Eq. 233

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!