David Lee DANIELS, Appellant, v. Sheriff Keith FERGUSON, in both his individual and official capacities; Sue McDonald, in both her individual and official capacities; Dr. Neil Mullins, in both his individual and official capacities; Cpl. Powell, in both his individual and official capacities; Cpl. Reams, in both his individual and official capacities; Officer Hernandez, in both his individual and official capacities; Officer Adams, in both his individual and official capacities, Appellees.
No. 08-3250.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 1, 2009.
Filed: Dec. 9, 2009.
David Lee Daniels, Arkansas Department of Correction, Tucker, AR, for Appellant.
Janan A. Davis, Jeremy Michael McNabb, Jason E. Owens, Michael R. Rainwater, Rainwater & Holt, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate David Daniels appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following an evidentiary hearing. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Daniels’s arguments, see Johnson v. Bi-State Justice Ctr., 12 F.3d 133, 135-37 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review; after evidentiary hearing, dismissal is proper if evidence does not present sufficient disagreement to require submission to jury but is so one-sided that one party must prevail as matter of law), we find no basis for reversal, see Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535-40, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (standard applicable to conditions-of-confinement claims by pretrial detainees).
*101Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.