134 N.J. Eq. 409

Margaret M. Rusch, executrix, &c., et al., respondents, v. Henry J. Melosh, executor, et al., appellants.

[Decided February 1st, 1944.]

Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, for the respondents.

Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, for the appellants.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by YiceChancellor Egan, and reported at 133 N. J. Eq. 502.

*410For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Donges, FIehbr, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Parker, Case, Colie, Rafferty, Hague, Dill, JJ. 6.

Rusch v. Melosh
134 N.J. Eq. 409

Case Details

Name
Rusch v. Melosh
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1944
Citations

134 N.J. Eq. 409

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!