The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion. t
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.
10272.
Decided May 7, 1919.
Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Glascock superior court—Judge Walker. November 29, 1918.
M. L. Felts, for plaintiff in error.
R. C. Norman, solicitor-general, contra.
The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion. t
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.
23 Ga. App. 713
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!