587 So. 2d 1214

Carol P. NUNNERY v. William A. NUNNERY.

2900446.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 6, 1991.

Julian B. Brackin and Thack H. Dyson of Brackin and Dyson, P.C., Foley, for appellant.

Robert A. Wills of Wills and Simon, Bay Minette, for appellee.

THIGPEN, Judge.

This case arises from post-divorce proceedings regarding a petition to modify.

An order was entered on December 3, 1990. The husband filed a motion to reconsider that order on December 18, 1990. That motion was denied by operation of law ninety days later. Rule 59.1, A.R.Civ.P. Subsequently, on April 8, 1991, the trial court granted the husband’s motion to reconsider. The wife appeals asking this court to reverse the April 8, 1991 order.

Rule 59.1, A.R.Civ.P. is clear that a post-judgment motion is denied by operation of law if the trial court fails to dispose of it within ninety days. It follows, therefore, that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter the order of April 8, 1991. Because that order was void and without effect, it will not support an appeal. Colb*1215urn v. Colburn, 510 So.2d 266 (Ala.Civ.App.1987).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and RUSSELL, J. concur.

Nunnery v. Nunnery
587 So. 2d 1214

Case Details

Name
Nunnery v. Nunnery
Decision Date
Sep 6, 1991
Citations

587 So. 2d 1214

Jurisdiction
Alabama

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!