In compliance with the mandate set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we have carefully reviewed this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal.1 It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Ray Epps, counsel who ably represented the defendant at trial, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for appellant is granted and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See • Local Rule 20. See also United States v. King, 456 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir., 1972); United States v. Mills, 446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir., 1971) ; United States v. Minor, 444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir., 1971).
481 F.2d 896
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Levern ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-1518
Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 14, 1973.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Nov. 5, 1973.
Raymond R. Epps, Houston, Tex., court-appointed, for defendant-appellant.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BELL, GODBOLD and IN-GRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Rogers
481 F.2d 896
Case Details
481 F.2d 896
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!