52 F. App'x 413

Rafael ESPINOZA-CAMPOS; et al., Petitioners, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 01-71334.

INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.*

Decided Dec. 12, 2002.

Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Espinoza-Campos and his wife Maria Urbana Medina De Espinoza, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding them removable. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo a constitutional challenge to the BIA’s application of a federal statute. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition.

Petitioners’ contention that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act’s permanent rules are impermissibly retroactive when applied to *414them is foreclosed by our decision in Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 602 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION DENIED.

Espinoza-Campos v. Ashcroft
52 F. App'x 413

Case Details

Name
Espinoza-Campos v. Ashcroft
Decision Date
Dec 12, 2002
Citations

52 F. App'x 413

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!