16 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1017

Filed May 14. 1888.

JAMES J. JONES, App’lt, v. THE MAYOR, etc., Resp’t.

Contract—Additional compensation.

Alex. Thain, for app’lt; H. R. Beekman, for resp’t.

Per Curiam.

We think that the judge would have been warranted in dismissing the complaint.

First On the ground that there was no.certificate; and

Second, That the work additional compensation was claimed for, there was evidence that it was included in the original contract.

*1018He did better for the plaintiff than he deserved; he submitted the case to the jury, and we shall not disturb it under this state of facts. ,

We think he received a more favorable consideration than he was entitled to, upon the evidence.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Jones v. Mayor
16 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1017

Case Details

Jones v. Mayor
Decision Date
May 14, 1888

16 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1017

New York



Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!