212 Pa. Super. Ct. 34

Commonwealth v. Arnold, Appellant.

Submitted December 13, 1967.

Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ.

Allen II. Smith, and Arnold, Briclcer, Beyer <f Barnes, for appellant.

Olarenee C. Newcomer, First Assistant District Attorney, and Wilson Bucher, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

March 20, 1968:

Opinion by

Wright, P. J.,

This is a companion appeal to that in Commonwealth v. Barclay, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 25, 240 A. 2d 838. Clark S. Arnold was indicted for racing on the highway on Bill No. 119 September Sessions 1966. He was tried with David G. Barclay, convicted and sentenced. He contends on this appeal that his arrest was unlawful because it was made as the result of evidence improperly obtained from Barclay. We need not and *35do not decide the legal question thus presented. Since we have held in the companion appeal that Barclay’s conversation with the police officer was properly admissible, Arnold’s argument in the instant appeal cannot prevail.

Judgment affirmed.

Hoffman and Spaulding, JJ., dissent.

Commonwealth v. Arnold
212 Pa. Super. Ct. 34

Case Details

Name
Commonwealth v. Arnold
Decision Date
Mar 20, 1968
Citations

212 Pa. Super. Ct. 34

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!