Farm Mortgage Holding Co. v. Miller 143 Kan. 790, 57 P.2d 35

143 Kan. 790 • 57 P.2d 35

No. 32,669

No. 32,670

Farm Mortgage Holding Company, Appellant, v. Louise Miller, a Widow (Revived in the names of Frederick W. Miller, Executor of the Estate of Louise Miller, deceased, et al.) et al., Appellees. Farm Mortgage Holding Company, Appellant, v. Louise Miller, a Widow (Revived in the names of Frederick W. Miller, Executor of the Estate of Louise Miller, deceased, et al.) et al., Appellees.

(57 P. 2d 35)

Opinion filed May 9, 1936.

Alfred E. Carroll, of Alma, and John F. Reinhardt, of Kansas City, Mo., for the appellant.

E. W. Stuewe, of Alma, and Ben C. Pickering, of Wamego, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

Two mortgage-foreclosure cases, both commenced by the'same plaintiff and against the same defendant, but on different tracts of land, have been consolidated upon appeal. The defendant was Louise Miller, a widow, who has died since the appeal was perfected, and a motion for revivor in the name of the executors of her estate and others was allowed. The appeal in each case has been taken by the plaintiff from the ruling of the trial court granting an extension of the eighteen-months period of redemption under the provisions of chapter 226 of the Laws of 1935, generally known as the second moratorium act of 1935. The- ruling in the case of Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Anthony, 142 Kan. 670, 52 P. 2d 1208, is applicable to the facts in these cases and the granting of further extensions under the moratorium law was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed.

Farm Mortgage Holding Co. v. Miller
143 Kan. 790 • 57 P.2d 35

Case Details

Name
Farm Mortgage Holding Co. v. Miller
Decision Date
May 9, 1936
Citations

143 Kan. 790

57 P.2d 35

Jurisdiction
Kansas
Court
Kansas Supreme Court

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!