For the reasons stated in the opinion handed down in the case of O’Brien v. Kursheedt (decided herewith) 29 N. Y. Supp. 973, the interlocutory judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with leave to the defendant to answer upon payment of the costs of the appeal and in the «curt below. All concur.
29 N.Y.S. 975
O’BRIEN et al. v. FITZGERALD et al.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
July 13, 1894.)
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Action by Miles M. O’Brien and others, receivers, etc., against Lawrence J. Fitzgerald, impleaded, etc. From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.
Jos. Fettretch, for appellants.
Samuel Untermyer, for respondents.
O’Brien v. Fitzgerald
29 N.Y.S. 975
Case Details
29 N.Y.S. 975
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!