668 F. Supp. 2d 273

UNITED STATES of America v. Juan OCASIO, Defendant.

Cr. No. 07-10102-MLW.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

June 5, 2009.

William H. Connolly, United States Attorney’s Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America.

William W. Fick, Federal Defender’s Office, District of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, Paul J. Garrity, Londonderry, NH, for Defendant.

ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

After an evidentiary hearing on June 5, 2009, for the reasons described in detail in court, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The government’s request to dismiss Juan Ocasio from all counts of the indictment with prejudice (Docket No. 52) is, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), ALLOWED. The charges against Ocasio are, therefore, hereby dismissed with prejudice. See Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 30 n. 15, 98 S.Ct. 81, 54 L.Ed.2d 207 (1977).

2. The government shall request that the transcript of the June 5, 2009 hearing be prepared on an expedited basis.

3. The Acting United States Attorney shall, by June 19, 2009:

a) Read the previously prepared transcript of the May 27, 2009 hearing and the transcript of the June 5, 2009 hearing, both of which include discussion of errors by the government in discharging its duties to discover and disclose material exculpatory information, as required by decisions such as Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 115 S.Ct. 1555, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995), and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, including L.R. 116.2(A)(3) and (B)(1)(b), L.R. 116.8, and L.R. 116.9. See also United States Attorneys Manual § 9-5.001(B)(2).

b) Provide copies of the transcripts of the May 27, 2009 and June 5, 2009 hearings to the Inspector General of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and to the Special Agent in Charge of the DEA’s Boston office for whatever action, if any, they deem appropriate with regard to education, supervision, and/or discipline.1

c) Certify to the court that the requirements of subparagraphs 3(a) and (b) hereinabove have been met.

United States v. Ocasio
668 F. Supp. 2d 273

Case Details

Name
United States v. Ocasio
Decision Date
Jun 5, 2009
Citations

668 F. Supp. 2d 273

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!