Judgment modified, by striking out the provision for an extra allowance, for want of power in the court at Trial Term to grant the same, and judgment as modified and order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
94 N.Y.S. 1149
HERTZ, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 9, 1905.)
Action by Lillian J. Hertz against the Manhattan Railway Company.
Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co.
94 N.Y.S. 1149
Case Details
94 N.Y.S. 1149
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!