215 So. 2d 7

Fay EHLEBRACHT, Petitioner, v. TROPICAL WINDOW CLEANING, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 37684.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1968.

Gerald T. Nolan, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 5, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that *8there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Ehlebracht v. Tropical Window Cleaning, Inc.
215 So. 2d 7

Case Details

Name
Ehlebracht v. Tropical Window Cleaning, Inc.
Decision Date
Oct 23, 1968
Citations

215 So. 2d 7

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!