Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Manuel Monarez-Quintero raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
188 F. App'x 322
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel MONAREZ-QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-51641.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 13, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Monarez-Quintero
188 F. App'x 322
Case Details
188 F. App'x 322
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!