In his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Richard Hendricks claimed that Keith Rasmussen (a psychiatrist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester) violated his civil rights by wrongfully ordering his involuntary commitment for mental illness. The district court1 granted Rasmussen’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Rasmussen was not a state actor under section 1983. Hendricks appeals, arguing that Rasmussen became a state actor when he invoked a state involuntary-commitment statute.
We agree with the district court that Rasmussen was not a state actor. See Youngblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851, 855 (8th Cir.2001) (private party’s mere invocation of state legal procedures does not constitute state action; finding no state action where merchant detained suspected shoplifter in reliance on state statute allowing reasonable detentions for reasonable amount of time); Ellison v. Garbarino, 48 F.3d 192,195-96 (6th Cir.1995) (finding no state action when private physician admitted patient pursuant to state involuntary-commitment statute). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.