211 Ala. 267 100 So. 226

(100 South. 226)

STATE ex rel. DAVIS, Solicitor, v. Julia SMITH, alias Borders.

(6 Div. 35.)

(Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 17, 1924.)

Jim Davis, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Roderick Beddow, of Birmingham, for ap-pellee.

THOMAS, J.

The decree of the circuit court will be affirmed as to.the findings of fact. The testimony was taken ore tenus before the judge rendering the decree. The rule of Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 South. 52, was extended to chancery causes in Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 South. 62, and Ray v. Watkins, 203 Ala. 683, 85 South. 25. As to taxing costs against complainant, the decree is corrected on authority of State ex rel. Davis, as Solicitor, v. Brown et al. (Ala. Sup.) 100 South. 224;1 the state’s said agent may pot be taxed with the costs.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is corrected and affirmed.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Davis v. Smith
211 Ala. 267 100 So. 226

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Davis v. Smith
Decision Date
Apr 17, 1924
Citations

211 Ala. 267

100 So. 226

Jurisdiction
Alabama

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!