No. 546.
March 12, 1918.
Petition for injunction. Before Judge Crum. Irwin superior court. July 21, 1917.
Hendricks, Mills <& Hendricks, Rogers & Rogers, Wall & Grant-ham, and E. K. Wilcox, for plaintiffs.
Eldridge Gutts and Quincey & Rice, for defendants.
The general rule is that the discretion of the judge of a superior court in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction on controverted issues of fact will not be controlled unless it has been manifestly abused. The case is within the general rule.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
147 Ga. 754
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!