ORDER*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the district court in its order dated July 7, 2003.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Nos. 03-56289, 03-56446.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2005.
Decided March 24, 2005.
Heather M. McKeon, Esq., The Quisenberry Law Firm, John N. Quisenberry, Esq., Quisenberry & Kabateck, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; and Stuart B. Esner, Esq., and Andrew N. Chang, Esq., Esner & Chang, Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiffs — Appellants.
Stuart B. Esner, Esq., Andrew N. Chang, Esq., Thomas V. Girardi, Esq., Girardi & Keese, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.
Delores A. Yarnall, Esq., Mardirossian & Associates, Deborah A. Berthel, Los Angeles, CA; and Sangeeta Madhok, Esq., and Sangeeta Madhok, Esq., MacGregor & Berthel, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant — Appellee.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the district court in its order dated July 7, 2003.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
124 F. App'x 587
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!