71 N.J. Eq. 769

William F. Barclay, respondent, v. Charles Roome Parmele Company, appellant.

[Argued June 26th, 1906.

Decided January 2d, 1907.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Fq. (J/. Robb.) @18.

iliessrs. Guild, hum & Tamblyn and Mr. Arthur A. Mickell (of the New York bar), for the appellant.

Messrs. Goult, Howell & Sm,iih and Mr. Henry W. Goodrich, for the respondent.

Per Curiam:.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.

For reversal—None.

Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.
71 N.J. Eq. 769

Case Details

Name
Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.
Decision Date
Jan 2, 1907
Citations

71 N.J. Eq. 769

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!