Per Curiam.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William E. Wood in the Law Division. 102 N. J. Super. 497 (1968). See, also, Smith v. Morris Tp. Comm., 101 N. J. Super. 271, 280 (App. Div. 1968).
104 N.J. Super. 456
SAUL BRAZER AND GLORIA BRAZER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued February 17, 1969
Decided February 24, 1969.
Before Judges Goldmann, Kolovsky and Carton.
Mr. Irvin B. Johnstone, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Johnstone & O’Dwyer, attorneys; Mr. Frank T. Swain, on the brief).
Mr. Charles J. Irwin argued the cause for respondents.
Brazer v. Borough of Mountainside
104 N.J. Super. 456
Case Details
104 N.J. Super. 456
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!