This is a suit for an accounting by Horace I. Pei ton and others against John Sisemore, and the only issues involved in the case are questions of fact. The case comes here on the appeal of plaintiffs from a decree against them. Prom an examination of the testimony, we are of the opinion that the decree of the court below should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
28 Or. 586 •
44 P. 286
Argued February 10;
decided March 23, 1896.
PELTON v. SISEMORE.
[44 Pac. 286.]
Appeal from Jackson: W. C. Hale, Judge.
Mr. William M. Colvig, for appellants.
Messrs. Lionel R. Webster and A. S. Hammond,, for respondent.
Pelton v. Sisemore
28 Or. 586 •
44 P. 286
Case Details
28 Or. 586
44 P. 286
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!