88 Ohio St. 3d 500

The State ex rel. Doolittle, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; Master Marketing Company, Appellee.

[Cite as State ex rel. Doolittle v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 500.]

(No. 99-1673

Submitted April 4, 2000

Decided May 24, 2000.)

Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jajfy, for appellant.

Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Bobbie S. Sprader and Nelson M. Reid, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for compliance with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook,’J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

State ex rel. Doolittle v. Industrial Commission
88 Ohio St. 3d 500

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Doolittle v. Industrial Commission
Decision Date
May 24, 2000
Citations

88 Ohio St. 3d 500

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!