269 So. 2d 664

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. W. E. “Bill” DAVIS, Respondent.

No. 41977.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD and Mc-CAIN, JJ., and LEE, Circuit Judge, concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents with opinion.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents and agrees with DEKLE, J.

DEKLE, Justice

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent in accord with the clear analysis expressed in the dissent of Judge Wigginton to the district court opinion.

State v. Davis
269 So. 2d 664

Case Details

Name
State v. Davis
Decision Date
Nov 29, 1972
Citations

269 So. 2d 664

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!