Order (oral) denying motion to suppress unanimously reversed and motion granted. Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The principal reasons for our decision herein are stated in the companion appeal (People v. Ryerson, 33 A D 2d 639, decided concurrently herewith.) We further conclude that this appellant, who occupied the apartment with Miss Ryerson, had standing to challenge the legality of the search by way of a motion to suppress. (Jones v. United States, 362 U. S. 257, 267; People v. McDonnell, 18 N Y 2d 509.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of violation of Penal Law, § 1751, subd. 2 and Public Health Law, § 3305.) Present — Del Vecehio, J. F., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
33 A.D.2d 640
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter Igor De Lissovoy, Appellant.
People v. De Lissovoy
33 A.D.2d 640
Case Details
33 A.D.2d 640
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!