Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Jones, an employee of Defendant-Appellee Cleco Corporation (“Cleco”), brought claims of race discrimination, retaliation, failure to promote, and hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law, and the Louisiana Commission on Human Rights against Cleco, as well as a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. He appeals the district court’s adverse judgment, but substantively challenges only the summary judgment as to the Section 1981 claim1 grounded in failure to promote.and hostile work environment.2 The record indicates that Jones has been employed by Cleco since 1985, and he is still employed by Cleco.
We have reviewed the respective positions of the parties on appeal as set forth in their briefs and the record on appeal, including the district court’s lengthy and comprehensive Memorandum Ruling on which its grant of Cleco’s second Motion for Summary Judgment is based. Disagreeing with Jones’s contentions that the district court erred in granting Cleco’s second Motion for Summary Judgment and that the conflicting evidence raises genuine issues of material fact, we conclude in our de novo review that the district court’s grant of Cleco’s second Motion for Summary Judgment was not reversible error. *463Accordingly, the district court’s Judgment of February 20, 2013 dismissing all remaining claims of Jones against Cleco is AFFIRMED.