90 N.J. Eq. 601

James M. Dunlap, respondent, v. Emma D. Chenoweth et al., appellants.

[Decided May 8th, 1919.]

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 88 N. J. Eq. 496.

Mr. David O. Watkins, for the respondent.

Mr. Timothy J. Middleton and Mr. Herbert A. Drake, for the appellants.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

*602 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER — 13.

For reversal — None.

Dunlap v. Chenoweth
90 N.J. Eq. 601

Case Details

Name
Dunlap v. Chenoweth
Decision Date
May 8, 1919
Citations

90 N.J. Eq. 601

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!