Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Angel Fredy Perez-Calderon raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
230 F. App'x 442
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Fredy PEREZ-CALDERON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51468
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 6, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Tex*443as, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Perez-Calderon
230 F. App'x 442
Case Details
230 F. App'x 442
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!