Jin Feng Xu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.*
In her petition for review, Xu contends that the Board and the immigration judge erred in denying her application for withholding of removal. We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Credibility determinations of the immigration judge and the Board are entitled to deference as long as they are supported by substantial evidence. See Figeroa v. INS, 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.1989). *227Based upon the materials before us on appeal, the immigration judge’s decision, and the Board’s order, we find the evidence supports the Board’s and the immigration judge’s conclusion that Xu was not credible. Accordingly, Xu’s challenge to the denial of her application for withholding from removal must fail. We further uphold the determination that Xu’s asylum application was frivolous. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.20(2006).
We therefore deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED