163 F. App'x 560

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lyle Douglas ROBISON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-35281.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.*

Decided Jan. 18, 2006.

Joshua A. Van De Wetering, Esq., USMI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Donahoe, Esq., FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana Helena Branch Office, Helena, MT, Lyle Douglas Robison, Waseca, MN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Lyle Douglas Robison appeals the district court’s order denying his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253,1 and we affirm.

Robison’s contention that he is entitled to relief under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) , and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) , 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), is foreclosed because such relief is not available retroactively on collateral review. See United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that Booker does not apply retroactively in § 2255 proceedings where the conviction was final as of the date of Booker’s publication).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Robison
163 F. App'x 560

Case Details

Name
United States v. Robison
Decision Date
Jan 18, 2006
Citations

163 F. App'x 560

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!