110 N.J. Eq. 664

Robert Rauh, Incorporated, appellant, v. George N. Bick et al., respondents.

[Decided May 16th, 1932.]

Messrs. Sandmeyer & Meisner, for the appellant.

Messrs. Fast & Fast and Messrs. Baud & Joseph E. Cohn, for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 108 N. J. Eq. 1.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Robert Rauh, Inc. v. Bick
110 N.J. Eq. 664

Case Details

Name
Robert Rauh, Inc. v. Bick
Decision Date
May 16, 1932
Citations

110 N.J. Eq. 664

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!