This is a rule to show caiise, dated October 7th, 1921, why a judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on December 8tli, 1921, should not be opened and the defendant permitted to file an answer. Under the rule testimony was taken. From that testimony our conclusion is that the defendant has failed to show a legal defense to the' action. The rule, therefore, is discharged, and the judgment entered December 8th, 1921, is allowed to stand.
2 N.J. Misc. 429
ETTA LEONHAUSER, PLAINTIFF, v. ANNA W. HALL, DEFENDANT.
Submitted February term, 1924
Decided May 26, 1924.
Ejectment — Motion to Open Judgment — Legal Defense Not Shown.
On rule.
Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Mintuen and Black.
For the plaintiff, George W. V. Moy.
For the defendant, Harvey Rolhberg.
Leonhauser v. Hall
2 N.J. Misc. 429
Case Details
2 N.J. Misc. 429
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!