88 A.D.3d 741 930 N.Y.S.2d 469

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Heron Inniss, Appellant.

[930 NYS2d 469]

The defendant’s contentions raised in point one of his brief are partially unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 *742[2]). In any event, those contentions do not warrant reversal (see People v Lewis, 48 AD3d 483, 484 [2008]; People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021 [2007]; see also People v Singh, 299 AD2d 498, 499 [2002]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

People v. Inniss
88 A.D.3d 741 930 N.Y.S.2d 469

Case Details

Name
People v. Inniss
Decision Date
Oct 4, 2011
Citations

88 A.D.3d 741

930 N.Y.S.2d 469

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!