ORDER
This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Amgen Inc. v. Harris, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 768, 193 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016).
REMANDED.
No. 10-56014.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 28, 2016.
Stephen J. Fearon, Jr., Squitteri & Fearon, LLP, New York, NY, Francis M. Gregorek, Betsy C. Manifold, Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA, Daniel L. Keller, Esquire, Keller, Fishback & Jackson, LLP, Tarzana, CA, Thomas James McKenna, Esquire, Gainey McKenna & Egleston, New York, NY, Mark C. Rifkin, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Emily Seymour Costin, Jonathan Rose, Alston & Bird LLP, Washington, DC, Steven Oliver Kramer, Esquire, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Jonathan David Moss, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Moez Kaba, Steven Feldman, Esquire, Hueston Henni-gan LLP, Los Angeles, Ca, Glenn Vanzu-ra, Bruce Adam Wessel, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Volchok, Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, Russell Laurence Hirsehhorn, Esquire, Myron D. Rumeld, Esquire, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.
*532Before: FARRIS and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges and KORMAN,* Senior District Judge.
ORDER
This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Amgen Inc. v. Harris, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 768, 193 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016).
REMANDED.
646 F. App'x 531
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!