Landry v. Hoepfner 822 F.2d 510

822 F.2d 510

Philip LANDRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Judge J. Robert HOEPFNER and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 85-3784.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 1987.

Mark McTernan, McTernan, Parr & Rumage, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.

Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research & Appeals, Gretna, La., for respondents-appellees.

Rene I. Salomon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Da’s.

E. Pete Adams, Executive Director, La. Dist. Attys. Assoc., Inc., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Exec. Dir. La. Da’s Assoc.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *511The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Landry v. Hoepfner

822 F.2d 510

Case Details

Name

Landry v. Hoepfner

Decision Date

Jul 9, 1987

Citations

822 F.2d 510

Jurisdiction

United States

Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!