126 N.J. Eq. 220

Sophie Wemple et al., complainants-respondents, v. B. F. Goodrich Company, defendant-appellant.

[Submitted May term, 1939.

Decided September 22, 1939.]

*221 Messrs. Insley, Decker Gross (Mr. William, B. Decker), for the defendant-appellant.

Messrs. Milberg «£• Milberg (Mr. Henry Milberg), for the complainant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The defendant appeals from a decree directing the specific performance of an agreement bearing date December 20th, 1935, calling for the transfer of certain judgments for a sum certain to be paid as specified. The amount to be paid was less than the face value of the judgments.

Such a contract, if breached, called for money damages only and is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity to specifically perform. The damages for the breach of such a contract being easily ascertainable and recoverable at law, equitable relief should have been withheld. Curtice Bros. Co. v. Catts, 72 N. J. Eq. 831; Burr v. Bloomsbury, 101 N. J. Eq. 615.

The decree is, therefore, reversed with costs to the end that the bill may be dismissed.

Bor affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Dowges, Heher, Peeskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.

Wemple v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
126 N.J. Eq. 220

Case Details

Name
Wemple v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
Decision Date
Sep 22, 1939
Citations

126 N.J. Eq. 220

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!