433 F. App'x 149

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Wesley INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6306.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 26, 2011.

Decided: June 1, 2011.

John Wesley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

*150Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Wesley Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 1:03-cr00372-JAB-l (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ingram
433 F. App'x 149

Case Details

Name
United States v. Ingram
Decision Date
Jun 1, 2011
Citations

433 F. App'x 149

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!