Quality ' Resources, Inc., appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of its diversity action claiming breach of contract and tortious interference with contracts and business expectancies. Upon careful de novo review of the record and consideration of the parties’ briefs, we conclude, for the reasons explained by the district court, that the complaint failed to state a claim. See Rochling v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 725 F.3d 927, 930 (8th Cir.2013) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
622 F. App'x 606
QUALITY RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1444.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Filed: Nov. 30, 2015.
Submitted: Nov. 27, 2016.
*607John J. Allan, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Michael S. Cargnel, Zach Chaffee-McClure, Shook & Hardy, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit judges.
Quality Resources, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.
622 F. App'x 606
Case Details
622 F. App'x 606
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!