This matter is before us in all respects and with the same reasons urged as in Alois Rou, Prosecutor, v. Thomas Peer et al., No. 280 of this term, and our conclusion is that the writ of certiorari must be dismissed for the same reasons given in case No. 280.
4 N.J. Misc. 865
HAROLD COURTER, PROSECUTOR, v. THOMAS PEER, RECORDER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CALDWELL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Decided October 21, 1926.
Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.
Eor the prosecutor, J. Chester Massinger.
Eor the respondents, Edward J. Katzenbach and Grover C. Bichman.
Courter v. Peer
4 N.J. Misc. 865
Case Details
4 N.J. Misc. 865
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!