For the reasons stated in my opinion in the case of Scudder v. Interurban Street Railway Company (herewith handed down) 89 N. Y. Supp. 1115, the determination appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
PATTERSON and LAUGHLIN, JJ., concur.
89 N.Y.S. 1105
GRIFFIN, Respondent, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 13, 1904.)
Action by William Griffin against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment of the Appellate Term, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Paul D. Cravath, for appellant.
Harcourt Bull, for respondent.
(dissenting). The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in Scudder v. Interurban Street Railway Co. (decided herewith) 89 N. Y. Supp. 1115. For the reasons stated in that case, I think the determination should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.
VAN BRUNT, P. J., concurs in this dissent.
Griffin v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
89 N.Y.S. 1105
Case Details
89 N.Y.S. 1105
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!