Harmon v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners 111 N.J.L. 238

*239Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 1297.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Bus kiek, Kays, Heteield Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ, 14.

For reversal — None.